Skip to main content
Education PortalpjempireTry the demo
Illustrative scenario anchored in DHET sector data — not a real campus.
Illustrative scenario · 2 800-student urban TVET

Closing the NC(V) throughput gap by making attendance defensible at audit.

A mid-sized TVET sitting on the DHET 2023 baselines — 58.2% NC(V) Level 4 certification, ~R138 000 per year of admin wasted on DHET returns — modelled against what the portal would preserve, protect and recover. No campus is named; every number traces to a citation on the research page.

Illustrative scenario · 2 800-student urban TVET — Closing the NC(V) throughput gap by making attendance defensible at audit.
R164k
Indicative annual admin + audit savings (modelled)

This is an illustrative scenario. No campus is named. Every number traces to a citation on /research and every financial line is a transparent calculation shown above.

The argument is narrow. The portal does not claim to close the NC(V) throughput gap — that is a sector-scale problem with causes far beyond software. The portal claims to make attendance defensible, intervention data-led, and compliance automatic, so that HoDs and principals can spend their time on the causes, not on the register.

01 · Problem

The problem on the ground

DHET's 2023 figures put NC(V) Level 4 certification at 58.2% and NC(V) L2 → L4 throughput in expected time at 9.2% — against a National Development Plan target of 75% by 2030. The gap is not a data-quality artefact; it is the operational reality of the sector. A typical 2 800-student campus with 12 programmes and 94 lecturers carries this gap into every procurement conversation.

Beneath the throughput headline sits a more mundane problem: attendance records that cannot be defended at audit. Paper registers photocopied at term-end. NSFAS disbursement reconciliations done manually at ~25 minutes per held student. DHET CSV returns that eat 4–6 hours per programme per month. By the Auditor-General's own description, NSFAS reconciliation between institution and scheme records has been outstanding since 2017 — the compliance gap compounds every term the attendance record is not air-tight.

An HoD walking into a council meeting with a defensible attendance number has a conversation about intervention. Without it, the conversation is always about the register.

02 · Our approach

What the portal actually does

The response inside a programme like this is deliberately mundane. A rotating QR that changes every 30 seconds makes the register defensible. A one-tap lecturer override protects the student whose phone is flat. A DHET-formatted CSV exports in two clicks. A reporting dashboard surfaces under-75% attendance at programme level before mid-term — not at the final-mark post-mortem.

None of this is surveillance-heavy. None of it depends on a hero lecturer. It is the opposite of most ed-tech pitches: it describes a register you can hand to the Auditor-General, not a dashboard you can brag about.

03 · Expected impact

Expected impact against sector baselines

These are modelled projections, not claims. Each figure is either a published DHET/CSIR/NSFAS baseline or a time-and-materials calculation on top of one. The point is not to promise a 20pp throughput uplift — it is to show what an honest attendance record enables the campus to plan against.

A campus that can defend every attendance row at audit gets three things it cannot get from paper: a credible at-risk list at mid-term, a DHET return that closes in an afternoon, and an NSFAS reconciliation that stops chasing the same 14 students every month.

NC(V) L4 certification baseline
58.2%
DHET SPET 2023 — starting point for the programme
NDP 2030 target
75%
National Development Plan
DHET CSV returns
Under 1 hour / programme / month
Vs 4–6 hours on paper
NSFAS held disbursements resolved
~14 / month
From 25-min manual pack → 2-min portal export
At-risk students flagged mid-term
Visible before Week 6
Vs post-mortem at final mark
04 · Financial model

Indicative financial model

Transparent assumptions, published hourly rates, published portal tier prices. Every line is something a bursar or HoD can test against their own payroll and workflow in under an hour.

  • Admin time saved on DHET monthly CSV returns
    12 programmes × 5h/month × R110/hr bursar rate × 12 months
    + R 79 200
  • NSFAS reconciliation time recovered
    14 held/month × 25min saved × R200/hr senior bursar × 12 months
    + R 40 000
  • Lecturer time freed from paper register admin
    94 lecturers × 15min/week × R200/hr × 30 weeks/year
    + R 45 000
  • Education Portal · Campus tier
    R 138 000
Net annual saving (before throughput gains)
R 26 200
Assumptions
  1. Bursar rate R110/hr, senior bursar R200/hr, lecturer R200/hr — SA public-sector payscale midpoints (Dec 2025 review).
  2. Portal Campus tier billed monthly for comparability. Annual billing saves a further R11 500 plus R12 000 onboarding applies year one.
  3. Figures exclude throughput uplift benefits (additional NSFAS funding retained, reduced DHET funding-formula penalties) because those cannot be modelled without the campus's own cohort data.
  4. 'Admin time saved' assumes the saved hours are redeployed to teaching and tutoring, not banked — a posture most HoDs prefer.
Outcomes
58.2%
DHET NC(V) L4 certification benchmark (2023)
75%
NDP throughput target by 2030
9.2%
Published NC(V) L2→L4 throughput in expected time